/How to tell if workflow is the problem
    Notes
    3 min read

    How to tell if workflow is the problem

    A note on spotting repeated friction that points to process design rather than motivation.

    If capable people keep hitting the same friction, the workflow deserves a closer look. Repetition is often the clue.

    Situation

    The same handoff gets missed, the same status question gets asked, and the same delay appears every week. People may be trying hard, but the path is not carrying enough context.

    The adjustment is to stop treating each miss as a separate issue and map the repeated path of the work.

    Common mistake

    Treating repeated workflow friction as a motivation problem.

    Practical Example

    Context

    A team kept chasing approvals after work was already complete.

    What happened

    Approval criteria were never defined at the handoff point.

    Adjustment

    The approval step was moved earlier and tied to a short checklist.

    Result

    The team reduced rework and stopped treating every approval as a new negotiation.

    Try this

    • Write down the last three repeated delays.
    • Find where each delay entered the workflow.
    • Ask what information was missing at that point.
    • Fix the handoff before adding reminders.

    What to take forward

    A workflow problem usually announces itself through repetition. The names and dates change, but the same kind of friction keeps returning.

    Once the pattern is visible, the work can be redesigned around the point where context keeps dropping.

    Need help applying this?

    Resources support learning. Guidance supports implementation.